Comments on: The Sarc Mark available for Linux? http://thinkmoult.com/2010/01/26/the-sarc-mark-available-for-linux/ Seriously who ever reads this description. Tue, 08 May 2012 05:44:44 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: hari http://thinkmoult.com/2010/01/26/the-sarc-mark-available-for-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-1901 hari Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:52:04 +0000 http://thinkmoult.com/2010/01/26/the-sarc-mark-available-for-linux/#comment-1901 No I realized it was TIC. However, I was being serious. The fact that somebody actually sells this thing is an outrage on my sensibilities and you gave me the perfect place to do it... :) No I realized it was TIC. However, I was being serious. The fact that somebody actually sells this thing is an outrage on my sensibilities and you gave me the perfect place to do it… :)

]]> By: Dion Moult http://thinkmoult.com/2010/01/26/the-sarc-mark-available-for-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-1900 Dion Moult Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:33:52 +0000 http://thinkmoult.com/2010/01/26/the-sarc-mark-available-for-linux/#comment-1900 Apparently I _do_ need this symbol to tell people that this entire article was sarcastic. Jeesh. Although I'm also against it, hari, the fact remains that the internet is governed by idiots, and not even Google can change that. Apparently I _do_ need this symbol to tell people that this entire article was sarcastic. Jeesh.

Although I’m also against it, hari, the fact remains that the internet is governed by idiots, and not even Google can change that.

]]> By: hari http://thinkmoult.com/2010/01/26/the-sarc-mark-available-for-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-1899 hari Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:24:43 +0000 http://thinkmoult.com/2010/01/26/the-sarc-mark-available-for-linux/#comment-1899 Isn't this sufficient :roll: ? Isn’t this sufficient :roll: ?

]]> By: hari http://thinkmoult.com/2010/01/26/the-sarc-mark-available-for-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-1898 hari Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:38:53 +0000 http://thinkmoult.com/2010/01/26/the-sarc-mark-available-for-linux/#comment-1898 I think this is a complete waste of time, not to mention that there's no standard in UTF-8 or ASCII way to have this character. It's just like a smilie and probably is a waste of $2. Besides, you either get sarcasm or don't. You just spoil it by pointing it out, like a good joke ruined on explaining. I think this is a complete waste of time, not to mention that there’s no standard in UTF-8 or ASCII way to have this character. It’s just like a smilie and probably is a waste of $2.

Besides, you either get sarcasm or don’t. You just spoil it by pointing it out, like a good joke ruined on explaining.

]]>