<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: rsync.net &#8211; a commendable backup solution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkmoult.com/2009/11/23/rsync-net-a-commendable-backup-solution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkmoult.com/2009/11/23/rsync-net-a-commendable-backup-solution/</link>
	<description>Seriously who ever reads this description.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 05:44:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: thinkMoult - Design, photography, and servers.</title>
		<link>http://thinkmoult.com/2009/11/23/rsync-net-a-commendable-backup-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-2993</link>
		<dc:creator>thinkMoult - Design, photography, and servers.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 06:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkmoult.com/2009/11/23/rsync-net-a-commendable-backup-solution/#comment-2993</guid>
		<description>[...] purchased myself a basic VPS plan from JohnCompanies &#8211; of whom is the parent company of a very commendable company called rsync.net, of whom I&#8217;m still very happy with. Although not as cheap (as in, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] purchased myself a basic VPS plan from JohnCompanies &#8211; of whom is the parent company of a very commendable company called rsync.net, of whom I&#8217;m still very happy with. Although not as cheap (as in, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dion Moult</title>
		<link>http://thinkmoult.com/2009/11/23/rsync-net-a-commendable-backup-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-1443</link>
		<dc:creator>Dion Moult</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 15:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkmoult.com/2009/11/23/rsync-net-a-commendable-backup-solution/#comment-1443</guid>
		<description>Hari, I actually just reread your post on your backup solution failing. http://harishankar.org/blog/entry.php/never-ever-use-an-external-usb-hard-drive-as-backup-media

As you say:
Other backup media are either specialized and are not easily accessible for desktop end users. Online backup is impractical even with high-speed internet connections and carries some obvious privacy and security risks, while local network backups require some kind of quality archival media already in place.

I&#039;d actually think you&#039;d find rsync.net does solve your problem there. Geo-redundancy if you&#039;re really paranoid? In general a company doing this knows how to deal with backups and you can be assured of their safety.

As for privacy and security, a quick skim through their TOS will show you where their priorities lie. It even goes so far to offer a canary report system. Note that you can encrypt your data and all secure protocols are supported.

As for the whole &quot;uploading&quot; cost, if you&#039;re on an unlimited bandwidth connection this should be no problem - every night tell it to upload, and within a week at most you&#039;ll have it online. The incremental uploads take no time at all.

The only question is if you&#039;re willing to take out your wallet :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hari, I actually just reread your post on your backup solution failing. <a href="http://harishankar.org/blog/entry.php/never-ever-use-an-external-usb-hard-drive-as-backup-media" rel="nofollow">http://harishankar.org/blog/entry.php/never-ever-use-an-external-usb-hard-drive-as-backup-media</a></p>
<p>As you say:<br />
Other backup media are either specialized and are not easily accessible for desktop end users. Online backup is impractical even with high-speed internet connections and carries some obvious privacy and security risks, while local network backups require some kind of quality archival media already in place.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d actually think you&#8217;d find rsync.net does solve your problem there. Geo-redundancy if you&#8217;re really paranoid? In general a company doing this knows how to deal with backups and you can be assured of their safety.</p>
<p>As for privacy and security, a quick skim through their TOS will show you where their priorities lie. It even goes so far to offer a canary report system. Note that you can encrypt your data and all secure protocols are supported.</p>
<p>As for the whole &#8220;uploading&#8221; cost, if you&#8217;re on an unlimited bandwidth connection this should be no problem &#8211; every night tell it to upload, and within a week at most you&#8217;ll have it online. The incremental uploads take no time at all.</p>
<p>The only question is if you&#8217;re willing to take out your wallet :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hari</title>
		<link>http://thinkmoult.com/2009/11/23/rsync-net-a-commendable-backup-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-1423</link>
		<dc:creator>hari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkmoult.com/2009/11/23/rsync-net-a-commendable-backup-solution/#comment-1423</guid>
		<description>We have greatly different philosophies when it comes to back up. Although our basic goal remains the same.

Having said that,  I don&#039;t believe in nuking files mercilessly especially if I&#039;ve created them and they represent some form of creative work. 

Programs, yes. They can be restored. Some files are irreplaceable. Disk space is cheap though. 

I am waiting for mass storage solid state devices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have greatly different philosophies when it comes to back up. Although our basic goal remains the same.</p>
<p>Having said that,  I don&#8217;t believe in nuking files mercilessly especially if I&#8217;ve created them and they represent some form of creative work. </p>
<p>Programs, yes. They can be restored. Some files are irreplaceable. Disk space is cheap though. </p>
<p>I am waiting for mass storage solid state devices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dion Moult</title>
		<link>http://thinkmoult.com/2009/11/23/rsync-net-a-commendable-backup-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-1410</link>
		<dc:creator>Dion Moult</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkmoult.com/2009/11/23/rsync-net-a-commendable-backup-solution/#comment-1410</guid>
		<description>About physical storage, I actually find that I feel more secure with a remote filesystem I won&#039;t have the chance of accidentally giving it one too many knocks.

I&#039;m rather thrifty with my filespace, I believe the ultimate destiny of any file on any computer is to be deleted &gt;:) For this reason I don&#039;t archive emails, I mercilessly nuke anything I haven&#039;t touched for a good couple years, and my favourite application is Filelight, which tells me which directory I should target next. The fortunate side effect of this is that I can afford to leave my computer uploading for 2.5 days straight to up my 6-7GB worth of to-be-nuked data.

If 100GB were cheap online, I wouldn&#039;t mind leaving my computer on a 4-week long upload when I sleep. After that incrementally it should be a breeze to maintain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About physical storage, I actually find that I feel more secure with a remote filesystem I won&#8217;t have the chance of accidentally giving it one too many knocks.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m rather thrifty with my filespace, I believe the ultimate destiny of any file on any computer is to be deleted >:) For this reason I don&#8217;t archive emails, I mercilessly nuke anything I haven&#8217;t touched for a good couple years, and my favourite application is Filelight, which tells me which directory I should target next. The fortunate side effect of this is that I can afford to leave my computer uploading for 2.5 days straight to up my 6-7GB worth of to-be-nuked data.</p>
<p>If 100GB were cheap online, I wouldn&#8217;t mind leaving my computer on a 4-week long upload when I sleep. After that incrementally it should be a breeze to maintain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hari</title>
		<link>http://thinkmoult.com/2009/11/23/rsync-net-a-commendable-backup-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-1409</link>
		<dc:creator>hari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkmoult.com/2009/11/23/rsync-net-a-commendable-backup-solution/#comment-1409</guid>
		<description>There are a couple of reasons why I could never use an online backup solution

1. I love to have physical access to the media of storage to my personal files and don&#039;t feel comfortable that it exists somewhere halfway across the globe in a remote server.

2. I have almost 100 GB of data that is valuable enough to back up and I simply couldn&#039;t back up so much (even 1 GB is daunting with a 64 kbps DSL connection) even if I wanted to.

Having said that, I would have to consider getting a more reliable storage media than an external USB hard drive. I wish solid-state storage came in bigger capacities as they seem to be more reliable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a couple of reasons why I could never use an online backup solution</p>
<p>1. I love to have physical access to the media of storage to my personal files and don&#8217;t feel comfortable that it exists somewhere halfway across the globe in a remote server.</p>
<p>2. I have almost 100 GB of data that is valuable enough to back up and I simply couldn&#8217;t back up so much (even 1 GB is daunting with a 64 kbps DSL connection) even if I wanted to.</p>
<p>Having said that, I would have to consider getting a more reliable storage media than an external USB hard drive. I wish solid-state storage came in bigger capacities as they seem to be more reliable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

