<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Wave Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkmoult.com/2009/10/26/google-wave-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkmoult.com/2009/10/26/google-wave-review/</link>
	<description>Seriously who ever reads this description.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:02:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dion Moult</title>
		<link>http://thinkmoult.com/2009/10/26/google-wave-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1870</link>
		<dc:creator>Dion Moult</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 04:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkmoult.com/2009/10/26/google-wave-review/#comment-1870</guid>
		<description>I would say that my stance relies on Wave being a _web_ application. Many of its flaws are simply due to the restrictions and inflexibility of a web interface. If wave were reimplemented as a desktop tool, then the interface could be moulded around an existing workflow - allowing people to discover new features, use it more efficiently, and of course, speed up the way to creating conventions on how to use Wave as a collaborative tool. I guess only until Google reaches that stage can Wave truly be useful for people and people can discover- as you say -&quot;How Wave could work best for me&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say that my stance relies on Wave being a _web_ application. Many of its flaws are simply due to the restrictions and inflexibility of a web interface. If wave were reimplemented as a desktop tool, then the interface could be moulded around an existing workflow &#8211; allowing people to discover new features, use it more efficiently, and of course, speed up the way to creating conventions on how to use Wave as a collaborative tool. I guess only until Google reaches that stage can Wave truly be useful for people and people can discover- as you say -&#8221;How Wave could work best for me&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heath</title>
		<link>http://thinkmoult.com/2009/10/26/google-wave-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1864</link>
		<dc:creator>Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 09:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkmoult.com/2009/10/26/google-wave-review/#comment-1864</guid>
		<description>I understand where you are coming from in this post, but most disruptive technologies are hard to understand how to use at first.

Many of my colleagues that are a little more senior (read: old) have a hard time with IM. They tend to write like a ton of text like it&#039;s an e-mail. I am sure they would have similar complaints about IM because they like e-mail.

It took me a while to figure out how Wave could work best for me, but now I am just amazed. From presentations to documents to task planning to blogging Wave is so versatile.

I think people will establish some ground rules for large scale collaborations and chats and the developers will obviously improve the structure. I&#039;m not a complete Google fanboy (no Android for me), but I think if you start using Wave as a replacement for documents you&#039;ll start to see it&#039;s power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand where you are coming from in this post, but most disruptive technologies are hard to understand how to use at first.</p>
<p>Many of my colleagues that are a little more senior (read: old) have a hard time with IM. They tend to write like a ton of text like it&#8217;s an e-mail. I am sure they would have similar complaints about IM because they like e-mail.</p>
<p>It took me a while to figure out how Wave could work best for me, but now I am just amazed. From presentations to documents to task planning to blogging Wave is so versatile.</p>
<p>I think people will establish some ground rules for large scale collaborations and chats and the developers will obviously improve the structure. I&#8217;m not a complete Google fanboy (no Android for me), but I think if you start using Wave as a replacement for documents you&#8217;ll start to see it&#8217;s power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dion Moult</title>
		<link>http://thinkmoult.com/2009/10/26/google-wave-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1264</link>
		<dc:creator>Dion Moult</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 02:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkmoult.com/2009/10/26/google-wave-review/#comment-1264</guid>
		<description>So far it does seem as far as online applications go Wave is topping other Google apps. However when comparing against desktop applications - there really is no competition. We&#039;re reinventing the wheel in the most crippled of environments (and I use that statement with caution - the web is a canvas and should be seen as one).

One should also realise that the majority of Google apps aren&#039;t that great. Google Sites is one such example - I don&#039;t think Wave will be any different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far it does seem as far as online applications go Wave is topping other Google apps. However when comparing against desktop applications &#8211; there really is no competition. We&#8217;re reinventing the wheel in the most crippled of environments (and I use that statement with caution &#8211; the web is a canvas and should be seen as one).</p>
<p>One should also realise that the majority of Google apps aren&#8217;t that great. Google Sites is one such example &#8211; I don&#8217;t think Wave will be any different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe620</title>
		<link>http://thinkmoult.com/2009/10/26/google-wave-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1234</link>
		<dc:creator>joe620</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 03:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkmoult.com/2009/10/26/google-wave-review/#comment-1234</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t used it yet but I am happy you didn&#039;t do the usual Google love review that I often see. I may really love Wave but I am so sick of hearing about how great things like Google Docs are. I mean come on, we had that stuff 15 years ago. The word processor is like notepad online. Anyway, I am actually hoping Wave tops other Google apps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t used it yet but I am happy you didn&#8217;t do the usual Google love review that I often see. I may really love Wave but I am so sick of hearing about how great things like Google Docs are. I mean come on, we had that stuff 15 years ago. The word processor is like notepad online. Anyway, I am actually hoping Wave tops other Google apps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris bailey</title>
		<link>http://thinkmoult.com/2009/10/26/google-wave-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1206</link>
		<dc:creator>chris bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkmoult.com/2009/10/26/google-wave-review/#comment-1206</guid>
		<description>At my college we use a different tool for working on our projects online.
Its free and needs no installation since its online, go to http://www.showdocument.com
pretty useful for me since i usually do my projects on the laptop. -chrisman</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At my college we use a different tool for working on our projects online.<br />
Its free and needs no installation since its online, go to <a href="http://www.showdocument.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.showdocument.com</a><br />
pretty useful for me since i usually do my projects on the laptop. -chrisman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

