Dion Moult Seriously who ever reads this description.

Achieving what?

I recently watched a video linked by a person called Florentyna Leow on Twitter (@heroin_e). I suggest you click the link and watch it yourself. It concerns how we’re “educating” ourselves out of creativity, and all just due to what we believe is important around us in this world.

I’ve sat through quite a good deal of talks on similar subjects, and I would like to say that yes, it is true. The people who give these talks certainly know what they’re talking about and feel a certain way about their topics. I too have some topics I feel strongly about, and now is my chance to voice my opinion on one of them.

There are several main flaws I find that consistently pop up with every single one of these speakers.

They don’t know what they are trying to achieve.

It’s very easy to say it’ll lead to something “better” and “brighter”, but why it is “better” and how “bright” it should be is certainly hardly touched upon. These are ignorantly shoved to Religion, whereeverybody believes differently and yet follow the same goals. Not one of them has been able to say exactly “what we want” – and then actually prove it.

I’m not saying that this is the form of a mathematical equation or something that can be parsed easily. I’m not even saying it can be communicated easily in any language. What I am saying is that what is a much more pressing issue is to 1) precisely identify a goal, and 2) ensure uniformity between our goals. In doing this, this brings me to point 2:

There is no practicality in their suggestions, or lack of them.

Again, it’s very easy to identify a problem. It’s also easy to communicate the problem to a (limited) audience. What the speakers don’t say is how to fix the problem, and if they do, they rarely consider how realistic and practical their approach is. This is because our minds are driven towards finding faults. We are exceptionally skilled at identifying faults in great detail. We then think we are clever and able to remove the fault, but instead all we are doing is hiding it. We’ve succeeded in hiding it so well that now we don’t even know what the root problem is.

In fact, look at what I’m doing now. I’m finding fault.

…continuing rather hypocritically:

Smart people don’t save us.

Too much faith is put into intelligence. This one does not appear as consistently through what I’ve heard, but it is an important point nonetheless. The majority of people in the world are stupid. This is a fact. It might sound arrogant but here I am simply stating it bluntly. Addressing such large-scale a problem as many of these speakers do must concern everybody in the world. This includes communicating the problem, communicating the solution, and carrying out the solution. In order for this to be done effectively, it isn’t how intelligent someone is that determines their effectiveness, it’s how wise they are. Wisdom is one of those funny words that cannot be defined precisely, and that’s why it is shunned when it comes to apparently “intellectual” problems. It is time to embrace wisdom, to actually understand the broad and bigger picture, and only then can something actually worth talking about be done.

What did this post achieve? Hardly anything. It’s a post made on a personal blog.

(Note: I apologise if this post sounded critical, a blog post isn’t the most effective medium for this topic hence why I write extremely rarely about it – oh, and if you enjoyed the first video, here’s another one you might like)

No related posts.


3 Comments

flory says: (24 May 2009)

rambling two cents, take with pinch of salt:
i think the whole point of these talks – and it can seem a bit lazy – is to provoke the idea that there is a problem in the first place (finding fault). if much of the world is stupid, then surely identifying the fact that there is a problem in the first place takes a greater intellectual leap. which is, probably, the whole point of TED.

cannot help but think of Achebe who said “Writers don’t give prescriptions, they give headaches!” same thing with these speakers – if we agree with them and think that that is the problem then it’s up to us to find our own prescriptions.

not very coherent, but what the hey.

Dion Moult says: (24 May 2009)

Quoted from chat log:

Dion Moult: hello
Florentyna Leow: hi
Dion Moult: was wondering what your views were on my latest post
Florentyna Leow: good timing, i just left a comment
Dion Moult: hahahaha
Dion Moult: you just gave me the sort of joy that comes when something happens exactly like how you predict it
Dion Moult: in this sentence “cannot help but think of Achebe who said ¿Writers don¿t give prescriptions, they give headaches!¿”
Dion Moult: not that i predicted the quote
Dion Moult: but the concept
Dion Moult: you see, we already know there’s a problem
Dion Moult: we use quotes by people living hundreds of years ago to prove it
Florentyna Leow: he’s alive.
Florentyna Leow: nitpicking, go on
Dion Moult: is he a scientist studying behavior and psychology?
Florentyna Leow: does that make any difference, curiously
Dion Moult: “our children are ruder, meaner, and a disgrace to the calm of our society. Disrespecting elders and talking back.”
Dion Moult: ^ Socrates
Dion Moult: yes, it makes a big difference
Dion Moult: because all we’re doing is saying “hey, i discovered something that was…damn, this guy already thought of it.” “oh, everybody ignored him too”
Florentyna Leow: hah
Florentyna Leow: no, he’s not. he’s a Nigerian writer.
Florentyna Leow: that quote was contextually political
Dion Moult: well, that’s point 3 that he’s a nigerian writer
Dion Moult: in fact when i gave my rose analogy in my “math in daily life” paper a long time ago ms pow said shakesphere gave a very similar quote
Dion Moult: i know nuts about english but perhaps you remember something shakesphear said about a rose
Florentyna Leow: um…a rose by any other name would smell as sweet?
Dion Moult: yeah that
Dion Moult: it’s a big pity nobody bothers to think “why is everybody ignoring me”
Florentyna Leow: you mean, “out loud”?
Florentyna Leow: i think that thought goes through a lot of people’s heads
Florentyna Leow: just that they wouldn’t say that out loud
Dion Moult: see points 2 and 3 in my post for that
Dion Moult: ” they rarely consider how realistic and practical their approach is”
Dion Moult: “This includes communicating the problem, communicating the solution, and carrying out the solution”
Dion Moult: i was ironic after i gave my thoughts on the open source community (part 2) that i actually experienced it first hand with Blendernation
Dion Moult: (if you read those posts)
Dion Moult: and that was the “practical” and “realistic” part of solving a problem
Dion Moult: i don’t know about you
Dion Moult: but what i want to do with my life is to do something practical
Dion Moult: it’s easy to think. that’s what we’ve been doing for god knows how long
Florentyna Leow: be it far from my intention to disagree with you
Florentyna Leow: still suggesting that their purpose is still to get people to think
Florentyna Leow: because..like you said, “most people are stupid” (not thinking)
Dion Moult: perhaps my point 3 didn’t communicate well
Dion Moult: “It is time to embrace wisdom, to actually understand the broad and bigger picture, and only then can something actually worth talking about be done.”
Dion Moult: the wisdom section refers to actually properly understanding the problem
Dion Moult: it’s no use communicating something you don’t understand yourself.
Dion Moult: it’s only useful to communicate a misunderstood issue if it’s small scale. this brings in valid ideas.
Dion Moult: on such a large scale, this is miscommunication, or if not, at least ineffective.
Dion Moult: ineffective – proven by so many hundred years of deja vu moments.

Note: the second video (link at bottom) has a good deal more quotes from dead people (mostly writers, too). The most awesome collection of “dead people epiphanic quotes” can be found in whatever religious texts you follow. (I am not insulting religion here, do not misunderstand what I wrote)

As a side note, have you ever thought:
“We would live harmoniously if we all believed exactly the same thing, even if what we believed was completely erroneous.”

p. says: (24 May 2009)

how do we determine if we’ve really achieved something? the unenlightened human mind is set to crave more and more after it has achieved its initial goals,thus creating more suffering (ie. the feeling of discontent due to thoughts of one not achieving anything)wisdom could do a lot to help here.

on your side note in the previous comment,i personally think that we,the people of the world are actually believing in the exact same thing.all of us want the same things-happiness,peace,etc.it’s merely that the ‘packaging’ of what we believe in is different.like a mathematical solution,just simplify them all..and the answer is the same.you and me.everyone.

Leave a Comment